梨园春

Chinese expert warns Philippines not to mistake humanitarian accommodation for concession as Philippine military twists facts on Ren’ai Jiao resupply_我的网站

A |     

    Screenshot from video obtained by the Global Times on July 21, 2026 shows the transfer of injured Philippine personnel near Ren'ai Jiao, which was overseen and assisted by the China Coast Guard. Photo: Courtesy of the China Coast GuardThe Philippine military side has again claimed that resupplying its grounded warship at Ren'ai Jiao needs no foreign approval and resupply there is within its self-claimed so-called EEZ, while Philippine media acknowledged that 15 "safe" resupply missions were made over the past two years under a China-Philippines provisional arrangement. 
Chinese experts warned on Wednesday that Manila should not mistake humanitarian accommodation for a concession and must bear the consequences if it scraps the arrangement.
Yang Xiao, a research fellow at the Institute of Peaceful Development under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Wednesday that the Philippine side's claims are fundamentally flawed from legal, historical and practical perspectives. 
Ren'ai Jiao is an inherent part of China's Nansha Qundao, over which China has indisputable and complete sovereignty, Yang said, adding that it is legally untenable for the Philippines to claim that Ren'ai Jiao is part of its exclusive economic zone.
"The Philippines deliberately grounded the abandoned warship at Ren'ai Jiao in 1999 and repeatedly pledged to remove it and restore the reef, but has failed to honor those commitments for more than two decades. This itself constitutes a continuing violation of China's territorial sovereignty," Yang said. 
This is not the first time the Philippines has denied seeking China's approval for resupply missions to Ren'ai Jiao. In April 2025, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun responded to similar claims, saying that China's position on how to handle the current situation at Ren'ai Jiao is clear and consistent.
"First, by keeping its warship grounded at Ren'ai Jiao for decades running, the Philippines has been violating China's sovereignty and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). We demand that the Philippines tow away the warship. Second, between now and when the warship is towed away, should the Philippines need to send living necessities, China is willing to allow it in a humanitarian spirit if the Philippines informs China in advance and after on-site verification is conducted. Third, if the Philippines were to send large amount of construction materials to the warship and attempt to build fixed facilities or permanent outpost, China will absolutely not accept it and will resolutely stop it in accordance with the law and regulations," said the spokesperson.
"This means that the Philippines' so-called '15 safe and incident-free resupply missions' were all made possible by China's humanitarian accommodation and strict oversight," Yang stressed. Each mission was reported in advance and allowed to proceed only after inspections confirmed no prohibited construction materials were aboard. The CCG intercepted any such materials through lawful measures, Yang said.
The Philippines' unilateral denial of its notification and inspection obligations while enjoying the arrangement's benefits amounts to a blatant breach of its commitments, the expert noted.
Yang also noted that Manila's narrative contains an obvious logical contradiction. If Philippine resupply missions were truly unimpeded, there would be no need for Manila to repeatedly claim that China had "blocked" its missions and call for international intervention. Yet if China had continuously "obstructed" the missions, the Philippines could not have completed 15 safe and incident-free resupply operations. 
"Manila has simply manipulated its narrative to suit its publicity needs, portraying itself as a 'victim' when seeking international attention while touting smooth resupply operations and its own strength when seeking to project toughness. Its hype over the 15 resupply missions is essentially aimed at rallying domestic support and stoking confrontation internationally to conceal the reality that its illegal presence is tightly constrained," Yang said.
China's handling of the Ren'ai Jiao situation, meanwhile, has consistently reflected restraint and humanitarian considerations. According to a statement by the China Coast Guard (CCG) spokesperson on the transfer of injured personnel by the Philippine side, Jiang Lue, a CCG spokesperson, said that on the morning of July 21, out of humanitarian considerations, China allowed the Philippines to transfer injured personnel by small boats from the BRP Sierra Madre (LT-57), which has been illegally grounded at Ren'ai Jiao, to Philippine Coast Guard vessel 9702. The CCG questioned and verified the Philippine vessels and monitored the entire process.
The CCG will continue to carry out rights-protection and law enforcement operations in accordance with the law in the waters around Ren'ai Jiao to safeguard China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, Jiang said.
Yang said, stressing that Manila's tough talk and one-sided claims cannot make up for its legal and moral shortcomings.
"Any attempt to permanently occupy Chinese islands and reefs, unilaterally tear up the understanding and continuously challenge China's territorial sovereignty runs counter to international law and the broader trend toward peace and development in the region and is ultimately doomed to fail," Yang added.
。    对开源模型的需求正在飙升          插图：贾里德·巴特曼          2026年7月21日          想想美国顶尖的人工智能开发者们吧。

B | 他们为每一个前沿模型的发布都倾注了无数心血、汗水和巨额资金。然而，还没等他们喘口气，竞争对手就已经迎头赶上。如果只有那些收费的竞争对手紧追不舍，那还算不错。但像Anthropologie和OpenAI这样的公司，还得拼命追赶那些免费提供模型的公司，才能勉强保持领先。         7月16日，中国初创公司Moonshot AI发布了Kimi K 3模型，其性能仅略逊于Anthropic和OpenAI的最新产品Fable和Sol。该模型的参数（或称“权重”）将于本月晚些时候免费公开，这意味着用户可以下载并在任何支持该功能的服务器上运行它。7月19日，中国互联网巨头阿里巴巴也发布了其Qwen系列模型的新成员预览版，该公司称该模型的性能仅次于Fable。         据研究公司Epoch AI的分析，目前最强大的开源权重模型（通常来自中国）与该技术的前沿水平仅相差数月（见图表）。这些系统的应用正在迅速普及。5月份，OpenRouter（一个热门的模型交易平台）的客户对美国顶级实验室提供的系统的使用量与对中国顶级实验室提供的系统的使用量基本持平，这是根据代币消耗量（业内常用的产出单位）来衡量的。次月，美国模型的使用量增长了三分之二，而中国模型的使用量则增长了两倍。         这不仅令美国顶尖的模型开发商感到不安，也令美国政府感到担忧，他们担心美国在人工智能领域的领先地位会因此丧失。据说，特朗普政府内部一些人士正在推动采取各种措施来减缓中国模型的传播。然而，美国政府在授予Fable和Sol等先进模型访问权限方面采取的反复无常的做法，也促使人们开始采用中国开发的开源替代模型。         早在K3发布之前，中国的开放权重模型就已引起全球关注。中国另一家实验室Z.ai于6月推出的GLM -5.2模型，在诸如软件开发等所谓的智能体任务上，表现优于美国另一家顶级模型开发商谷歌目前提供的任何模型。

C | 另外两家中国实验室DeepSeek和MiniMax的模型也广受欢迎。据Firefox浏览器开发商Mozilla的一份报告显示，开放权重模型在前沿推理和复杂智能体任务方面仍处于落后地位，目前已被广泛认为足以胜任许多任务。         它们的成本也低得多——这在企业努力应对人工智能成本不断上涨的问题时是一项重要的优势。另一家研究公司 Artificial Analysis 会追踪选定模型在其测试套件中执行每项任务的成本。DeepSeek 提供的最强大的系统平均每次任务的成本为 0.04 美元。尚未开源的K3平均成本为 0.95 美元。Fable 的用户预计需要支付 2.75 美元。

D |          成本差异的部分原因在于，几乎任何云服务提供商都可以出售开放权重模型的访问权限，从而拉低利润率。例如，DeepSeek 提供其 v4 闪存模型的访问权限，价格为每百万代币 0.28 美元，而最便宜的第三方服务提供商的价格为每百万代币 0.18 美元。         此外，许多开源模型在训练时特别注重高效运行，部分原因是由于美国对先进芯片的限制，中国实验室在获取计算能力方面面临挑战。诸如“专家混合模型”之类的创新技术已被开源模型开发者广泛应用，该模型仅激活人工智能系统中与查询相关的部分，DeepSeek 和阿里巴巴等实验室在该技术领域取得了长足进步。         然而，开源模型的吸引力远不止于此。

E | 由于美国政府仓促试图阻止除美国公民以外的所有人使用Fable模型，导致该模型在全球范围内停用三周，这促使许多公司重新审视自身对独立实验室的依赖。这促使他们尝试使用开源替代方案，这些方案可以通过多个供应商访问，甚至可以在内部服务器上运行。Mozilla首席技术官拉菲·克里科里安指出，这一事件犹如一声“警钟”。

F |

Current article:http://2e3pqoq.ruwentaqintiaozhupapaigai.shop/news/20260826_5842.html

Published on:08:47:57